Jack v. State

Fourth Circuit

Jack v. State

427 F. App'x 277

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2011·No. No. 11-1175·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action on the grounds of Eleventh Amendment and judicial immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. West Virginia, No. 2:10-cv-00063-JPB-JSK, 2011 WL 318753 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 28, 2011). We deny the motions to seal the informal brief and for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action on the grounds of Eleventh Amendment and judicial immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. West Virginia, No. 2:10-cv-00063-JPB-JSK, 2011 WL 318753 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 28, 2011). We deny the motions to seal the informal brief and for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jack v. State, 427 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

427 F. App'x 277 (Jack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.