Jack v. Saunders
4 P. 487, 2 Cal. Unrep. 353
This text of 4 P. 487 (Jack v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jack v. Saunders, 4 P. 487, 2 Cal. Unrep. 353 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
Appellants’ counsel, in his “points and authorities,” insists that the order denying the motion for a new trial should be reversed on the ground that the decision of the court below was not justified by the evidence. We have examined the evidence and found a material conflict therein, and for that reason cannot disturb the order appealed from.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 P. 487, 2 Cal. Unrep. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-v-saunders-cal-1884.