Jack v. Moore

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 6, 2005
• Docket: 05-1213
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1213

TODD M. JACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BECKY MOORE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-05-4)

Submitted: June 10, 2005 Decided: July 6, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Cameron O’Brion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Todd Michael Jack appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine* and the

doctrine of judicial immunity. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Jack v. Moore, No. CA-05-4 (E.D.

Va. filed Feb. 22, 2005; entered Feb. 24, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).

- 2 -