Jack v. Dawson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1626

TODD M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PRESIDENT CUTLER DAWSON,

Defendant – Appellee.

No. 09-1721

No. 09-1757

Plaintiff – Appellant, v.

CUTLER DAWSON, President, Navy Federal Credit Union,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00031-gec; 5:09-cv-00038-gec; 5:09-cv-00044-gec)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Dawson, Nos.

5:09-cv-00031-gec, 5:09-cv-00038-gec, and 5:09-cv-00044-gec

(W.D. Va. filed May 20, entered May 21, 2009; June 11, 2009;

filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED