Jack v. Davis

29 Ga. 219
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

— Lumpkin J.

By the Court.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] We hold the Court was right in overruling plaintiff’s motion, to strike out defendants plea of set-off. And the case of Gerry vs. Perryman, (6 Ga. Rep. 119,) is conclusive upon this point.

[2.] The writ should not have been dismissed, but amended thus: “ Francis M. Jack by his prochein ami or guardian, [221] ad litem, A. B. for the use of Jesse M. Butt, against James C. Davis.”

Infants should sue and be sued, in their own name, by guardian or next friend. And if an infant defendant will not appoint a guardian, the Court will do it for him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jack v. Davis, 29 Ga. 219 (Ga. 1859).

29 Ga. 219 (Jack v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. Pardue
22 S.E.2d 143 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Cannon v. Whiddon
21 S.E.2d 850 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Carroll v. Carroll
160 S.E. 342 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Georgia State Bank v. Harden
124 S.E. 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Huley v. Huley
114 S.E. 184 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lanham
53 S.E. 395 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Third National Bank v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
40 S.E. 1016 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
78 N.W. 103 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1899)