Jack Ulmer, Inc. v. Daniel, Attorney General
This text of 7 S.E.2d 829 (Jack Ulmer, Inc. v. Daniel, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 195 March 28, 1940.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by The facts in this case are not in dispute and are succinctly and clearly stated by Judge Gaston in his order on Circuit, from which this appeal comes. His exposition of the statute, and conclusions of law therefrom, meet the approval of this Court and are adopted by it. Let it be reported.
The judgment of the Court below is affirmed.
MESSRS. JUSTICES CARTER and FISHBURNE and MESSRS. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICES J. HENRY JOHNSON and E. H. HENDERSON concur. *Page 205
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 S.E.2d 829, 193 S.C. 193, 1940 S.C. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-ulmer-inc-v-daniel-attorney-general-sc-1940.