Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller
259 F.2d 272, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730
This text of 259 F.2d 272 (Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller, 259 F.2d 272, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730 (10th Cir. 1958).
Opinion
259 F.2d 272
Jack STINNETT
v.
A. Marlo MILLER.
No. 5819.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
July 9, 1958.
Cooney & Morgan, Farmington, N.M., for appellant.
Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PER DURIAM.
Reversed as to costs without written opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 F.2d 272, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-stinnett-v-a-marlo-miller-ca10-1958.