Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller
259 F.2d 272, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730
Opinion
259 F.2d 272
Jack STINNETT
v.
A. Marlo MILLER.
No. 5819.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
July 9, 1958.
Cooney & Morgan, Farmington, N.M., for appellant.
Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N.M., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PER DURIAM.
Reversed as to costs without written opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller, 259 F.2d 272, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4730 (10th Cir. 1958).
259 F.2d 272 (Jack Stinnett v. A. Marlo Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.