Jack R. Croteau v. Borden Company and Eastman Kodak Corporation

395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1968
Docket17104
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 395 F.2d 771 (Jack R. Croteau v. Borden Company and Eastman Kodak Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack R. Croteau v. Borden Company and Eastman Kodak Corporation, 395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6670 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

*772 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant Eastman Kodak Company entered upon a verdict directed by the district court after the close of the defendant’s case. 1 The district court held, inter alia, that Eastman Kodak’s failure to warn was not the proximate cause of an explosion which resulted in plaintiff’s loss of his left hand. See Croteau v. Borden Co., 277 F.Supp. 945 (E.D.Pa.1968).

We have independently examined the entire record, and we can find no error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

1

. The district court also entered judgment in favor of defendant Borden Company, but plaintiff did not appeal from this judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-r-croteau-v-borden-company-and-eastman-kodak-corporation-ca3-1968.