Jack Poss v. State
This text of Jack Poss v. State (Jack Poss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00010-CR
JACK POSS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING MEMORANDUM OPINION1
I agree with the majority’s holding that the trial court did not abuse its
discretion by adjudicating Appellant’s guilt. But for the reasons stated in my
concurrence to the majority opinion in Laboriel-Guity v. State2 and in my
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 336 S.W.3d 754, 757–59 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref’d) (Dauphinot, J., concurring). concurring and dissenting opinions to the majority opinions in Means v. State3
and Kim v. State,4 I dissent from the majority’s holding that Appellant forfeited his
excessive punishment complaint by not raising it in the trial court.
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT JUSTICE
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2.(b)
DELIVERED: June 6, 2013
3 347 S.W.3d 873, 875–76 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.) (Dauphinot, J., concurring and dissenting). 4 283 S.W.3d 473, 476–79 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref’d) (Dauphinot, J., concurring and dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jack Poss v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-poss-v-state-texapp-2013.