Jack Patton v. State
Opinion
Jack Patton seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for official misconduct. Sentence was imposed on August 28, 2003. There was a timely motion for new trial. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore November 26, 2003. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). Notice of appeal was filed on December 8, 2003. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested, as required in criminal cases. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Pickens v. State, 105 S.W.3d 746, 748 n.2 (Tex. App.--Austin 2003, no pet.). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction.
The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Puryear and Pemberton
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 23, 2004
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Patton v. State (Jack Patton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.