Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. v. Edward Lloyd, Individually and D/B/A a Franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 2, 2005
Docket07-03-00269-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. v. Edward Lloyd, Individually and D/B/A a Franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd. (Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. v. Edward Lloyd, Individually and D/B/A a Franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. v. Edward Lloyd, Individually and D/B/A a Franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

JACK N JILL DONUTS INC V. LLOYD

NO. 07-03-0269-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

MARCH 2, 2005

______________________________

JACK N JILL DONUTS, INC., APPELLANT

V.

EDWARD LLOYD, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

A FRANCHISEE OF JACK N JILL DONUTS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2002-519,037; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. DODSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. (footnote: 1)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. perfected this appeal to challenge the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts.  The final judgment recites that Jack N Jill take nothing by its suit and that Edward Lloyd recover attorney’s fees in the amount of $17,500.

Pending before this Court is an agreed judgment by which the parties request we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Lloyd and EDEB, Ltd. attorney’s fees and render judgment that they take nothing from Jack N Jill. (footnote: 2)  The parties further request that the portion of the judgment holding that Jack N Jill take nothing from Lloyd and EDEB, Ltd. be affirmed.  Finally, the parties agree to bear their own costs.  The agreed judgment is signed by counsel for all parties.

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure we reverse and render in part and affirm in part.  To effectuate the parties’ agreement, that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd., is reversed and judgment is hereby rendered that they take nothing from Jack N Jill, Donuts, Inc.  The portion of the judgment that Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. take nothing against Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd. is in all other respects affirmed.   Costs are to be assessed by the party incurring them.

Don H. Reavis

   Justice

FOOTNOTES

1:

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

2:

Although not mentioned in the final judgment, EDEB, Ltd. was made a party to the underlying case by Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc.’s live pleading.  The final judgment provides that it disposes of all claims and all parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. v. Edward Lloyd, Individually and D/B/A a Franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-n-jill-donuts-inc-v-edward-lloyd-individually-texapp-2005.