Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor v. Eyerly Aircraft Company and Jack Eyerly
454 F.2d 1173, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11489
Opinion
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. * The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying sanctions under Rule 37(d), F.R.Civ.P. Appellee caused unnecessary matters to be included in the appendix to the extent that four fifths of the cost of producing the appendix is cast upon appellee. Rule 30(b), F.R.A.P.
*
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor v. Eyerly Aircraft Company and Jack Eyerly, 454 F.2d 1173, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11489 (5th Cir. 1972).
454 F.2d 1173 (Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor v. Eyerly Aircraft Company and Jack Eyerly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990
430 F.2d 966 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)