Jack Jordan v. LABR

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: February 21, 2020
• Docket: 19-1743
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-1743 ___________________________

Jack Jordan

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

U.S. Department of Labor

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph ____________

Submitted: February 12, 2020 Filed: February 21, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Jack Jordan appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) action. After a careful

1 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. review, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing some claims as duplicative of another pending litigation, see United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 920 F.2d 487, 489 n.6 (8th Cir. 1990) (district court’s decision to dismiss an action in deference to a pending action in another court is reviewed for abuse of discretion); and in granting summary judgment as to the remaining claims, see Madel v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 784 F.3d 448, 451 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo; summary judgment is appropriate where an agency proves that it has fully discharged its obligations under FOIA). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-