Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System

337 F.2d 623
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 6, 1964·No. 14835_1·Published

Opinion

337 F.2d 623

Jack HOWARD,
v.
ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant.
TALANT TRANSFER COMPANY
v.
INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM.

No. 14835.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 22, 1964.
Decided Nov. 6, 1964.

William C. Walker, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (H. A. Robinson, Bernard J. McAuley, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief) for appellant.

Frank J. Kernan, Pittsburgh, Pa., (P. J. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Jack Howard.

V. C. Short, Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart & Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Talant Transfer Co.

Joseph S. D. Christof, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Joseph R. Doherty, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Interstate Motor Freight System.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no prejudicial error arising out of the trial of this suit in the district court. The judgment of that court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System, 337 F.2d 623 (3d Cir. 1964).

337 F.2d 623 (Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc.
337 F.2d 623 (Third Circuit, 1964)