Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System
This text of 337 F.2d 623 (Jack Howard v. Associated Transport, Inc., Talant Transfer Company v. Interstate Motor Freight System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jack HOWARD,
v.
ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant.
TALANT TRANSFER COMPANY
v.
INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM.
No. 14835.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 22, 1964.
Decided Nov. 6, 1964.
William C. Walker, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (H. A. Robinson, Bernard J. McAuley, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief) for appellant.
Frank J. Kernan, Pittsburgh, Pa., (P. J. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Jack Howard.
V. C. Short, Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart & Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Talant Transfer Co.
Joseph S. D. Christof, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Joseph R. Doherty, McCloskey, Best & Leslie, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Interstate Motor Freight System.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no prejudicial error arising out of the trial of this suit in the district court. The judgment of that court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 F.2d 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-howard-v-associated-transport-inc-talant-tran-ca3-1964.