Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134017 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JACK HINTON and BEVERLY HINTON, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiffs, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
v SC: 134017 AGC: 1275/06 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 10, 2007 _________________________________________ s0830 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-hinton-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2007.