Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2007·No. 134017·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

134017 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JACK HINTON and BEVERLY HINTON, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiffs, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134017 AGC: 1275/06 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 10, 2007 _________________________________________ s0830 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2007).

Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Jack Hinton v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.