Jack George Feltman v. State
This text of Jack George Feltman v. State (Jack George Feltman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-06-00119-CR
JACK GEORGE FELTMAN, Appellant
Â
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
                                             Â
On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court
Lamar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 21395
                                                Â
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
            Jack George Feltman appeals from his conviction by the trial court, on his plea of guilty, for burglary of a building. The trial court sentenced Feltman to eighteen years' imprisonment. We dismiss Feltman's appeal for want of jurisdiction.
            The trial court filed a certification, in accordance with Rule 25.2(a)(2), that "the defendant has waived the right of appeal." Rule 25.2(a)(2) states, in pertinent part:
(2) . . . A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). If a certification showing that the appellant has the right to appeal is not made a part of the appellate record, we must dismiss the case unless the record affirmatively indicates that the appellant may have the right to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for Thirteenth Judicial Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We have examined the clerk's record to determine whether the trial court's certification is defective. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. Nothing in the record indicates the certification is defective. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.
            We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
                                                                        Jack Carter
                                                                        Justice
Date Submitted:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â August 31, 2006
Date Decided:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â September 1, 2006
Do Not Publish
tion Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
                       Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
                                               ______________________________
                                                            No. 06-10-00122-CV
                                               ______________________________
                       ESSENT PRMC, L.P., D/B/A PARIS REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER AND D/B/A R.A.C.E. FOR LIFE CENTER, Appellant
                                                               V.
                                             RAY BANKS, Appellee
                                                                                                 Â
                                      On Appeal from the 62nd Judicial District Court
                                                            Lamar County, Texas
                                                           Trial Court No. 77660
                                                                                                 Â
                                         Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
                                             Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
                                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION
           Essent PRMC, L.P., d/b/a Paris Regional Medical Center and d/b/a R.A.C.E. for Life Center, the sole appellant in this case, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss its appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.
           We dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jack George Feltman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-george-feltman-v-state-texapp-2006.