Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 02-11-00242-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-242-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00242-CV

Jack Eugene Waggoner

APPELLANT

AND APPELLEE

V.

Susan Gale Waggoner

APPELLEE

AND APPELLANT

------------

FROM THE 271st District Court OF Wise COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties’ “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeals shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  February 2, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner (Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.