Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-11-00242-CV
|
Jack Eugene Waggoner |
APPELLANT AND APPELLEE |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Susan Gale Waggoner |
APPELLEE AND APPELLANT |
|
------------
FROM THE 271st District Court OF Wise COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered the parties’ “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeals shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 2, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner (Jack Eugene Waggoner v. Susan Gale Waggoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.