Jack Edwin Hill v. United States
This text of 281 F.2d 443 (Jack Edwin Hill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
281 F.2d 443
Jack Edwin HILL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 16792.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
August 15, 1960.
Rehearing Denied October 10, 1960.
On Appeal from the Judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Gus J. Solomon, Judge.
Jack Edwin Hill, in pro. per.
C. E. Luckey, U. S. Atty., Robert C. Snashall, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before HEALY, CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order of the district court of January 4, 1960, denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed, after consideration of the records and briefs in the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 F.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-edwin-hill-v-united-states-ca9-1960.