Jack Collins, III v. Dakota County District Court

435 F. App'x 581
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2011
Docket11-2411
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 435 F. App'x 581 (Jack Collins, III v. Dakota County District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack Collins, III v. Dakota County District Court, 435 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jack Collins III appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful de novo review, see Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. FEMA, 615 F.3d 985, 988 (8th Cir.2010), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated, see Harris v. Mo. Court of Appeals, 787 F.2d 427, 429 (8th Cir.1986) (state courts possess Eleventh Amendment immunity from § 1983 suit). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-collins-iii-v-dakota-county-district-court-ca8-2011.