Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Anthony Maniscalco, II v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Mark Rozells, and Michael Lea v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association

72 F.3d 686
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 2, 1996
Docket94-55209
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 686 (Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Anthony Maniscalco, II v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Mark Rozells, and Michael Lea v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Anthony Maniscalco, II v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Mark Rozells, and Michael Lea v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association, 72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

72 F.3d 686

Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
Anthony Maniscalco, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver
for Imperial Savings Association, an insured
depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial
Federal Savings Association,
Defendant-Appellee.
Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated; Mark Rozells, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Michael Lea, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver
for Imperial Savings Association, an insured
depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial
Federal Savings Association,
Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 94-55209, 94-55218.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Filed Jan. 2, 1996.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants Anthony Maniscalco and Michael Lea, members of a class action brought by Jack Cohen and other employees of Imperial Savings Association against the Resolution Trust Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss their appeals, including their pending petitions for rehearing and a suggestion for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the appellants' motion is granted. Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Under Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1994), we vacate our opinion, 61 F.3d 725 (9th Cir.1995), and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Blair.

APPEAL DISMISSED AND OPINION VACATED. CASE REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blair v. Shanahan
38 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-cohen-on-behalf-of-himself-and-all-others-similarly-situated-and-ca9-1996.