JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE v. DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A.
This text of JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE v. DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A. (JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE v. DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE, Appellants,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A., Appellee.
No. 4D22-1332
[August 10, 2023]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017- CA-009399-XXXX-MB.
Mark L. Pomeranz of Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., Hallandale, for appellants.
Kimberly S. Mello and Arda Goker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE v. DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-cirrincione-and-julie-cirrincione-v-deutsche-bank-na-fladistctapp-2023.