Jack Carpenter v. Ina Claire Watson, Individually and as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust
This text of Jack Carpenter v. Ina Claire Watson, Individually and as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust (Jack Carpenter v. Ina Claire Watson, Individually and as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00216-CV __________________
JACK CARPENTER, Appellant
V.
INA CLAIRE WATSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANK AND INA WATSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 258th District Court San Jacinto County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV14,744 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jack Carpenter and Appellee Ina Claire Watson, Individually and
as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust, filed a Joint Motion to
Dismiss Without Prejudice. The parties have agreed that the trial court’s order
granting Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment is an interlocutory order.
On February 22, 2022, the trial court signed an order that granted Watson’s
motion for a no-evidence summary judgment and dismissed Carpenter’s affirmative
1 defenses of “limitations, collateral estoppel, waiver, and laches[.]” On June 8, 2022,
the trial court signed an order that dismissed Carpenter’s claims that he “acquired
superior title to the property in dispute . . . by limitation by adversely possessing the
property in dispute[.]” The trial court’s orders lack language that clearly and
unequivocally demonstrates that the trial court intended the order to completely
dispose of the entire case. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex.
2001).
Through their joint motion, Carpenter and Watson agree that the appeal
should be dismissed because the trial court has not signed a final judgment that
disposes of every pending claim and party before the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.1(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 2, 2022 Opinion Delivered November 3, 2022
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jack Carpenter v. Ina Claire Watson, Individually and as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-carpenter-v-ina-claire-watson-individually-and-as-trustee-of-the-texapp-2022.