Jack Brewer v. Robert C. Ramirez, in His Official Capacity as Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00177-CV
JACK BREWER APPELLANT
V.
ROBERT C. RAMIREZ, IN HIS APPELLEE OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2
------------
FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On November 20, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
We dismiss appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal as moot.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 16, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jack Brewer v. Robert C. Ramirez, in His Official Capacity as Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2 (Jack Brewer v. Robert C. Ramirez, in His Official Capacity as Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.