Jack and Beverly Randall v. State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue, and JP Segura
This text of Jack and Beverly Randall v. State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue, and JP Segura (Jack and Beverly Randall v. State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue, and JP Segura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00018-CV
Jack and Beverly RANDALL, Appellants
v.
STATE FARM LLOYDS, Cannon Perdue, and JP Segura, Appellees
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 24-17706 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2026
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Appellants Jack and Beverly Randall have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, indicating that they have resolved all issues forming the basis of this appeal. The motion
is granted, and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because
there is no indication of an agreement to the contrary, costs are taxed against appellants. See id. R.
42.1(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jack and Beverly Randall v. State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue, and JP Segura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-and-beverly-randall-v-state-farm-lloyds-cannon-perdue-and-jp-segura-txctapp4-2026.