Jacinto v. Casey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Jacinto v. Casey

115 R.I. 914

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedSeptember 9, 1975

DocketM. P. No. 75-249

StatusPublished

This text of 115 R.I. 914 (Jacinto v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacinto v. Casey, 115 R.I. 914 (R.I. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing from the record that the trial justice in issuing a preliminary injunction against the defendants apparently failed to comply with the mandate of Super. R. Civ. P. 65(a), and thereby denied the defendants an effective opportunity to present relevant evidence, the defendants’ motion for a stay pending appeal is granted. Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc., 446 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1971); Sims v. Greene, 161 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1947); 1 Kent, R. I. Civ. Prac. §65.3 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing from the record that the trial justice in issuing a preliminary injunction against the defendants apparently failed to comply with the mandate of Super. R. Civ. P. 65(a), and thereby denied the defendants an effective opportunity to present relevant evidence, the defendants’ motion for a stay pending appeal is granted. Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc., 446 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1971); Sims v. Greene, 161 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1947); 1 Kent, R. I. Civ. Prac. §65.3 (1969).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 R.I. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacinto-v-casey-ri-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack