Jablowski v. the Peoples Savings Bank

Connecticut Superior Court

Jablowski v. the Peoples Savings Bank

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 288, 4 Conn. Supp. 288, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 186

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 27, 1936

DocketFile #54335

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 288 (Jablowski v. the Peoples Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jablowski v. the Peoples Savings Bank, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 288, 4 Conn. Supp. 288, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 186 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

It is apparent that the defendant in its Special Defense is laying the foundation for the claim that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the place where he was working because the relationship of master and servant existed between him and the defendant. It is not alleged however that the plaintiff was employed directly by the defendant but rather that he was employed by one Walter Jablonski without alleging any relationship to have existed between Walter Jablonski and the defendant.

In order to fairly apprise the plaintiff as to just what the claim of the defendant is in this regard it should be made to appear what the relationship was which is claimed to have existed between Walter Jablonski and the defendant.

The motion is therefore granted the more specific statement to be filed within two weeks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is apparent that the defendant in its Special Defense is laying the foundation for the claim that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the place where he was working because the relationship of master and servant existed between him and the defendant. It is not alleged however that the plaintiff was employed directly by the defendant but rather that he was employed by one Walter Jablonski without alleging any relationship to have existed between Walter Jablonski and the defendant.

In order to fairly apprise the plaintiff as to just what the claim of the defendant is in this regard it should be made to appear what the relationship was which is claimed to have existed between Walter Jablonski and the defendant.

The motion is therefore granted the more specific statement to be filed within two weeks.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 288, 4 Conn. Supp. 288, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jablowski-v-the-peoples-savings-bank-connsuperct-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack