Jablonski v. Rojcewicz

246 Mass. 336
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 26, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 Mass. 336 (Jablonski v. Rojcewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jablonski v. Rojcewicz, 246 Mass. 336 (Mass. 1923).

Opinion

By the court.

The plaintiffs seek in this action of contract to recover compensation for services alleged to [338]*338have been rendered by them to the defendant. The case was referred to an auditor, whose findings were to be final. No question of law was reported by him. His findings in favor of the plaintiffs were clear and consistent, positive arid comprehensive. The contract was found to have been fully performed by the plaintiffs. New obligations incurred by the defendant were voluntary on his part and did not impair the contract rights of the plaintiffs. The adjustment between the parties, whereby the plaintiffs agreed to charge a specified sum to a third person, does not affect their right to collect from the defendant the amount due from him according to compromise. The only judgment legally possible on the findings made by the auditor is in favor of the plaintiffs for the amount found due by him.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howland v. Stowe
194 N.E. 888 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 Mass. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jablonski-v-rojcewicz-mass-1923.