J.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.A. v. State

758 So. 2d 1276, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 2000 WL 726516

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 7, 2000

DocketNo. 4D99-3836

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 758 So. 2d 1276 (J.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.A. v. State, 758 So. 2d 1276, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 2000 WL 726516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J.A. appeals the judgment adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Department of Juvenile Justice for a level six, moderate risk residential program after he pled nolo contendere to possession of marijuana. J.A. contends that the trial court failed to make a thorough inquiry into whether he voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to counsel before accepting his plea. Because J.A. did not first move to withdraw his plea in the trial court, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to J.A.’s right to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); see also § 985.234, Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(m) and 9.145.

DISMISSED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J.A. appeals the judgment adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Department of Juvenile Justice for a level six, moderate risk residential program after he pled nolo contendere to possession of marijuana. J.A. contends that the trial court failed to make a thorough inquiry into whether he voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to counsel before accepting his plea. Because J.A. did not first move to withdraw his plea in the trial court, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to J.A.’s right to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); see also § 985.234, Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(m) and 9.145.

DISMISSED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 So. 2d 1276, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 2000 WL 726516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ja-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack