J White L.C. v. Wiseman
This text of J White L.C. v. Wiseman (J White L.C. v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION
J. WHITE, L.C., et al., ORDER
Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:16-cv-001179-DBB-PMW
v. District Judge David B. Barlow GREGORY WISEMAN, et al., Chief Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner Defendants.
This case was referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).1 Before the court are Defendants (1) Brookwood Investments, LLC (“Brookwood”) and Villa Franche Investments, LLC’s (“Villa”) motion to compel arbitration;2 (2) SLC 2100 South 2010, LLC (“SLC 2100”) and RW Wasatch, LLC’s (“RW Wasatch”) motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs’ claims and to stay further proceedings;3 and (3) PCCP JSP Fairway, LLC (“Fairway”) and PCCP JSP Springs (“Springs”) motion to compel arbitration and stay further proceedings.4 In response, Plaintiffs filed amended notices of non-opposition to the motions to compel arbitration.5 For the reasons stated in the motions to compel arbitration and
1 See ECF Nos. 60, 201. 2 See ECF No. 179. 3 See ECF No. 182. 4 See ECF No. 199. 5 See ECF Nos. 239, 240, 241. Plaintiffs’ amended notices of non-opposition, the motions are granted, and the court stays this action as to the above referenced Defendants pending completion of arbitration. ORDER Accordingly, the court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1. Defendants Brookwood and Villa’s motion to compel arbitration6 is GRANTED. The claims against Brookwood and Villa are STAYED pending the completion of arbitration proceedings between Plaintiffs and Brookwood and Villa. Plaintiffs and Defendants Brookwood and Villa shall file a status report every 90 days from the date of this order regarding the status of arbitration proceedings. 2. Defendants SLC 2100 and RW Wasatch’s motion to compel arbitration of
Plaintiffs’ claims and to stay further proceedings 7 is GRANTED. The claims against SLC 2100 and RW Wasatch are STAYED pending the completion of arbitration proceedings between Plaintiffs and Defendants SLC 2100 and RW Wasatch. Plaintiffs and Defendants SLC 2100 and RW Wasatch shall file a status report every 90 days from the date of this order regarding the status of arbitration proceedings. 3. Defendants Fairway and Springs’ motion to compel arbitration and stay further proceedings 8 is GRANTED. The claims against Defendants Fairway and Springs are STAYED pending the completion of arbitration proceedings between Plaintiffs and Fairway and Springs.
6 See ECF No. 179. 7 See ECF No. 182. 8 See ECF No. 199. Plaintiffs and Defendants Fairway and Springs shall file a status report every 90 days from the date of this order regarding the status of arbitration proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of April, 2020. BY THE COURT: LA be PAULM.WARNERs—s—s Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
J White L.C. v. Wiseman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-white-lc-v-wiseman-utd-2020.