J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Prince

Louisiana Court of Appeal

J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Prince

141 So. 2d 882, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1997

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 22, 1962

DocketNo. 9723

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 2d 882 (J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Prince, 141 So. 2d 882, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1997 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiff through a petition for judicial review of the final action of the Division of Employment Security of the State allowing unemployment compensation in favor of the defendant employee, Wniiam R. Prince, and, additionally, the Administrator of the State Department was named as a defendant. From judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff disqualifying defendant-employee from benefits, the latter was granted a devolutive appeal to this Court.

The defendant-appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief in this court. Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 4(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S., this Court is authorized to dismiss the instant appeal, ex proprio motu. This rule has been enforced in numerous cases and citation of authority is no longer necessary.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal taken herein by William R. Prince, defendant-appellant, be and it is dismissed at his cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiff through a petition for judicial review of the final action of the Division of Employment Security of the State allowing unemployment compensation in favor of the defendant employee, Wniiam R. Prince, and, additionally, the Administrator of the State Department was named as a defendant. From judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff disqualifying defendant-employee from benefits, the latter was granted a devolutive appeal to this Court.

The defendant-appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief in this court. Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 4(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S., this Court is authorized to dismiss the instant appeal, ex proprio motu. This rule has been enforced in numerous cases and citation of authority is no longer necessary.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal taken herein by William R. Prince, defendant-appellant, be and it is dismissed at his cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 2d 882, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-weingarten-inc-v-prince-lactapp-1962.