J. Walter Thompson Advertising Corp. v. Woodworth
This text of 254 A.D. 721 (J. Walter Thompson Advertising Corp. v. Woodworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Whether or not the sufficiency of the counterclaim may be raised on motion for a trial by jury of the issues raised by the reply thereto (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 424, 425), we are of opinion that the motion should have been granted as the counterclaim states a good cause of action at law. Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 721, 4 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-walter-thompson-advertising-corp-v-woodworth-nyappdiv-1938.