J. W. Huff v. H. C. Glenn

81 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 444
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 3, 1935·No. No. 8099.·Published

Opinion

MeCLENDON, Chief Justice.

This is a usury suit. The instruments relied upon as constituting a contract for usurious interest are in all essential respects the same as those construed and held not to import usurious interest in Walker v. Temple Trust Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 60 S.W.(2d) 826, recently affirmed by the Supreme Court, 80 S. W.(2d) 935.

The case also presents the question of assumption of the debt by vendee of maker, as purging the transaction of the taint of usury. The above holding renders discussion of this question unimportant; and we therefore pre-termit it.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

, Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. W. Huff v. H. C. Glenn, 81 S.W.2d 1118, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 444 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

81 S.W.2d 1118 (J. W. Huff v. H. C. Glenn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Temple Trust Co.
80 S.W.2d 935 (Texas Supreme Court, 1935)
Walker v. Temple Trust Co.
60 S.W.2d 826 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)