J. W. Hoodwin Co. v. Pinkerton

Appellate Court of Illinois

J. W. Hoodwin Co. v. Pinkerton

204 Ill. App. 298, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 368

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided March 12, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,713·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Partnership, § 52*—when evidence is insufficient to show. Evidence held insufficient to show that certain defendants, appellants, were connected in any way, as partners or otherwise, with a certain detective agency, to an agent of which plaintiff paid a certain sum of money, in an action to recover such money.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Partnership, § 52*—when evidence is insufficient to show. Evidence held insufficient to show that certain defendants, appellants, were connected in any way, as partners or otherwise, with a certain detective agency, to an agent of which plaintiff paid a certain sum of money, in an action to recover such money.

J. W. Hoodwin Co. v. Pinkerton, 204 Ill. App. 298, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 368 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

204 Ill. App. 298 (J. W. Hoodwin Co. v. Pinkerton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.