Home/U.S. Customs Court/J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States

J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 213, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Cust. Ct. 66 →
United States Customs Court·Decided October 6, 1948·No. No. 52591; protests 139965-K, etc. (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise invoiced as cod-liver oil pulp residue, cod-liver oil pulp, or cod-liver oil residue is similar in all material respects to that the subject of J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. et al. v. United States (20 Cust. Ct. 66, C. D. 1085), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1780 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 213, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 676 (cusc 1948).

21 Cust. Ct. 213 (J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 66 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)