J. W. Goldsmith Inc. v. Vrooman

23 S.E.2d 504, 68 Ga. App. 528, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 164
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 4, 1942
Docket29693.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 S.E.2d 504 (J. W. Goldsmith Inc. v. Vrooman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. W. Goldsmith Inc. v. Vrooman, 23 S.E.2d 504, 68 Ga. App. 528, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinions

Felton, J.

Where a contract for the sale of an automobile contains the provision that “no agreement, promise, representation, statement or warranty, whether oral or written, express or implied, shall be binding on the holder unless expressly contained herein,” the purchaser can not recover of the seller damages allegedly arising from false and fraudulent representations concerning the automobile, which allegedly induced the execution of the contract of sale, where there was no fraud, accident, or mistake as a result of which the buyer signed the contract without knowing its contents. Waits v. Lumpkin, 59 Ga. App. 416 (1 S. E. 2d, 72), and cit. A verdict was demanded for the seller and the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial. It is not necessary to consider the special assignments of error.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SCM Corp. v. Thermo Structural Products, Inc.
265 S.E.2d 598 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Alpha Kappa PSI Building Corp. v. Kennedy
83 S.E.2d 580 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E.2d 504, 68 Ga. App. 528, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-w-goldsmith-inc-v-vrooman-gactapp-1942.