J. W. Ferguson Co. v. Seaman
This text of 191 A. 739 (J. W. Ferguson Co. v. Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a -workmen’s compensation case. While the language of the petition might be susceptible of an attempt to review a prior finding by the court, it was treated in the court below by both prosecutor and respondents as one for increased disability, and as such an increased award was allowed to the claimant. With the finding on that phase of the case our examination leads us to conclude that it was justified by the proofs.
The various legal contentions raised by the prosecutor we think have all been answered in the negative by the decisions of this court. Tucker v. Beltramo, Inc., 117 N. J. L. 72; 186 Atl. Rep. 821; McLaughlin v. Hahne, 113 N. J. L. 32; 172 Atl. Rep. 566; Ecken v. O’Brien, 115 N. J. L. 33; 178 Atl. Rep. 373; affirmed, 116 N. J. L. 94; 183 Atl. Rep. 273.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A. 739, 15 N.J. Misc. 393, 1937 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-w-ferguson-co-v-seaman-nj-1937.