J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb

Mississippi Supreme Court

J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb

67 Miss. 200

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 200 (J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb, 67 Miss. 200 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The relation sustained by Jones to the land was such as to make a deed of trust, executed by him on the crop to be grown on the land, valid, because such crop had a potential existence, within the meaning of the law. Although the legal title of the land was in Gross, and Jones had only a bond for title, he had possession of the land and the consent of Gross to occupy it,- and the rights of a legal owner of all crops to be produced on it.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The relation sustained by Jones to the land was such as to make a deed of trust, executed by him on the crop to be grown on the land, valid, because such crop had a potential existence, within the meaning of the law. Although the legal title of the land was in Gross, and Jones had only a bond for title, he had possession of the land and the consent of Gross to occupy it,- and the rights of a legal owner of all crops to be produced on it.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Miss. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-stadeker-son-v-loeb-miss-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack