J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb
67 Miss. 200
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The relation sustained by Jones to the land was such as to make a deed of trust, executed by him on the crop to be grown on the land, valid, because such crop had a potential existence, within the meaning of the law. Although the legal title of the land was in Gross, and Jones had only a bond for title, he had possession of the land and the consent of Gross to occupy it,- and the rights of a legal owner of all crops to be produced on it.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb, 67 Miss. 200 (Mich. 1889).
67 Miss. 200 (J. Stadeker & Son v. Loeb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bacot v. Varnado
47 So. 113 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)