J. Schaeffer, Inc. v. Hoppen

173 So. 900, 127 Fla. 703, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1516
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 16, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the appeal in this cause it seems to a majority of the Court that the rule laid down in the case of Love v. Miami Laundry Co., 118 Fla. 137, 160 Sou. Rep. 32, to the effect that a court of equity will not enforce by equitable means the provisions of an executory contract of employment against the employee where the terms thereof are such that the Court could not enforce part thereof by equitable means against the employer, is applicable to the controversy here involved and that therefore there is no error in the decree appealed from and that the same should be affirmed on the authority of that decision.

*704 Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. Schaeffer, Inc. v. Hoppen, 173 So. 900, 127 Fla. 703, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1516 (Fla. 1937).

173 So. 900 (J. Schaeffer, Inc. v. Hoppen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arond v. Grossman
75 So. 2d 593 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Lyon v. Southern Laundry, Inc.
194 So. 794 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)