J. S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J. S. v. State

382 So. 2d 1335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 1980

DocketNo 78-2201

StatusPublished

This text of 382 So. 2d 1335 (J. S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. S. v. State, 382 So. 2d 1335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the adjudication of delinquency, D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and (b) no reversible error has been shown relative to the trial court’s rulings regulating the cross examination of the state witness Frank Bates. Pandula v. Fonseca, 145 Fla. 395, 199 So. 358 (1940); § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the adjudication of delinquency, D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and (b) no reversible error has been shown relative to the trial court’s rulings regulating the cross examination of the state witness Frank Bates. Pandula v. Fonseca, 145 Fla. 395, 199 So. 358 (1940); § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

382 So. 2d 1335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-s-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack