J. S. v. State
382 So. 2d 1335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466
Opinions
The adjudication of delinquency under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the adjudication of delinquency, D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and (b) no reversible error has been shown relative to the trial court’s rulings regulating the cross examination of the state witness Frank Bates. Pandula v. Fonseca, 145 Fla. 395, 199 So. 358 (1940); § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. S. v. State, 382 So. 2d 1335, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
382 So. 2d 1335 (J. S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Alaska
415 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Cowheard v. State
365 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Holt v. State
378 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Kufrin v. State
378 So. 2d 1341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Pandula v. Fonseca
199 So. 358 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
D. S. H. v. State
323 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Greene v. State
376 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)