J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd.
328 F.2d 623, 1965 A.M.C. 1349, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6172
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment in admiralty in a collision case on the Houston Ship Channel.
The district judge filed full findings of fact and conclusions of law,1 and entered judgment accordingly.
As is usual in cases of this kind, the appellant makes a great outcry against the findings. We are, however, convinced that this is much ado about nothing and that the decree should be affirmed on the ground that the findings are not shown to be clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd., 328 F.2d 623, 1965 A.M.C. 1349, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6172 (5th Cir. 1964).
328 F.2d 623 (J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd. v. Tug San Pedro
226 F. Supp. 879 (S.D. Texas, 1962)