J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd.

Fifth Circuit

J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd.

328 F.2d 623, 1965 A.M.C. 1349, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1964

DocketNo. 20528

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.2d 623 (J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. S. Gissel & Co. v. Sir William Reardon Smith & Sons, Ltd., 328 F.2d 623, 1965 A.M.C. 1349, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6172 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in admiralty in a collision case on the Houston Ship Channel.

The district judge filed full findings of fact and conclusions of law,¹ and entered judgment accordingly.

As is usual in cases of this kind, the appellant makes a great outcry against the findings. We are, however, convinced that this is much ado about nothing and that the decree should be affirmed on the ground that the findings are not shown to be clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in admiralty in a collision case on the Houston Ship Channel.

The district judge filed full findings of fact and conclusions of law,¹ and entered judgment accordingly.

As is usual in cases of this kind, the appellant makes a great outcry against the findings. We are, however, convinced that this is much ado about nothing and that the decree should be affirmed on the ground that the findings are not shown to be clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.2d 623, 1965 A.M.C. 1349, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-s-gissel-co-v-sir-william-reardon-smith-sons-ltd-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack