J. Rich Steers, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.

168 F.2d 875, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2149
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 1948
DocketNo. 253, Docket 20964
StatusPublished

This text of 168 F.2d 875 (J. Rich Steers, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. Rich Steers, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 168 F.2d 875, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2149 (2d Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is true that the district judge did not find in so many words that the blow which the dredge delivered to the scow “H.S. 56” and which that scow passed on to the scow “H.S. 51” was more violent than is to be expected in the harbor, often spoken of as a “harbor bump”; but in his opinion he says that he accepted the testimony of the libellant’s witnesses, and this he repeated in the thirteenth finding of fact; so that we may assume that he incorporated the testimony in that finding. Thompson, who was on the scow “H.S. 56,” testified that “the blow was so hard it knocked me right off my feet.” Swansen, who was either on the “56,” or on a rowboat alongside, said that when the “Mogul” “came over and hit us I almost lost my balance. * * * it almost knocked me overboard.” Serviss, another witness, described the blow as “a good solid blow against the scow 56, and everything went ringle-wrangle for a minute.” We should not be justified in holding that it was “clearly erroneous” to find that the collision was more than a “harbor bump.”

In addition, the master of the dredge, Parrish, knew that timbers protruded from the concrete wall alongside of which the scow was moored, and even told the libellant’s engineer that “they were going to do some damage probably to our steel scows, leave alone a wood scow.” Koch, who was in charge of the dredge at the time of the [876]*876collision, whs not indeed shown to have been informed of the presence of the timbers ; and the claimant argues that it should therefore not be charged with Parrish’s information. We do not rest liability upon Parrish’s failure to inform Koch; but we do not wish to be understood as holding that it would not be proper to do so.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 F.2d 875, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-rich-steers-inc-v-great-lakes-dredge-dock-co-ca2-1948.