J. R. Watkins Co. v. Rutherford
This text of 199 So. 235 (J. R. Watkins Co. v. Rutherford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit on a bond or contract of guaranty by the terms of which guarantors jointly, severally and unconditionally guaranteed to pay the indebtedness, the amount of which is written in the agreement, for certain goods, wares and merchandise sold by the appellant to one Stabler, the principal obligor, in the instrument on which suit is based.
The assignment of error superinducing the involuntary nonsuit was the overruling of demurrer to Pleas C and D, and the sustaining of demurrer to replications two and three to said plea.
Defendants Turberville and Rutherford, by special pleas, attempted to defend the suit on the ground that each signed the contract of guaranty on condition that one McDuffie was to execute the instrument as guarantor before delivery, and that the principal obligor delivered the instrument to plaintiff without procuring the required signature of said third party.
There was no error in the ruling of the trial court, which was according to the decision in O’Neal v. Turner, 230 Ala. 24, 158 So. 801, and the ruling in W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Williams, 235 Ala. 623, 180 So. 272. The later cases collect the authorities to like effect by this court.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 So. 235, 240 Ala. 335, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-r-watkins-co-v-rutherford-ala-1940.