J. R. Raible Co. v. State Tax Commission

194 So. 556, 29 Ala. App. 184, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 78
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 1939·No. 3 Div. 814.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

On Rehearing.

It is a rule too well established to require the citation of authority that in construing Revenue Statutes or Statutes levying a license or tax upon the citizen any uncertainties must be resolved in favor of the tax payer. Unless the tax levied is clear and unequivocal, it cannot be enforced.

We do not find any evidence in this record which would justify a finding that the plaintiff was other than a manufacturer, and such sales of its products that were made were incidental to its business as a manufacturer and not as a merchant; and, in none of the Statutes, do we find this license tax levied against manufacturers on sales made by them as such manufacturers.

The opinion is amplified and extended, and the application for rehearing is overruled.

Application overruled.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Raible Co. v. State Tax Commission, 239 Ala. 41, 194 So. 560.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. R. Raible Co. v. State Tax Commission, 194 So. 556, 29 Ala. App. 184, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 78 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

194 So. 556 (J. R. Raible Co. v. State Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.
835 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
Haralson v. State Ex Rel. King
71 So. 2d 79 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
City of Bolivar v. Ozark Utilities Co.
191 S.W.2d 368 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1945)
State v. Coastal Petroleum Corporation
198 So. 610 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)