J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc. v. Rokmin Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc. v. Rokmin Concrete Corp.

99 A.D.2d 464, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 464 (J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc. v. Rokmin Concrete Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc. v. Rokmin Concrete Corp., 99 A.D.2d 464, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions to recover damages for alleged overpayments and payments due pursuant to contracts between the parties, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Vitale, J.), entered June 22, 1982, which, after a nonjury trial, was in favor of respondent in the principal amount of $21,586. Judgment modified, on the facts, so as to reduce the principal sum awarded to $18,873.19. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A review of the record indicates that the judgment was fair and reasonably based on the credible evidence. However, the court inadvertently failed to grant a credit to appellant in the sum of $2,712.81. This credit was due under the Cottman Avenue project and was not in dispute. The judgment should be reduced accordingly. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions to recover damages for alleged overpayments and payments due pursuant to contracts between the parties, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Vitale, J.), entered June 22, 1982, which, after a nonjury trial, was in favor of respondent in the principal amount of $21,586. Judgment modified, on the facts, so as to reduce the principal sum awarded to $18,873.19. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A review of the record indicates that the judgment was fair and reasonably based on the credible evidence. However, the court inadvertently failed to grant a credit to appellant in the sum of $2,712.81. This credit was due under the Cottman Avenue project and was not in dispute. The judgment should be reduced accordingly. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 464, 470 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-petrocelli-construction-inc-v-rokmin-concrete-corp-nyappdiv-1984.