J. P. Heidt v. State
161 So. 918, 26 Ala. App. 648
Opinion
The evidence in this case has been read and considered by the court en banc. It is the opinion of the court that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction; therefore error prevailed by the court’s refusal to give the affirmative charge requested in writing by defendant.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. P. Heidt v. State, 161 So. 918, 26 Ala. App. 648 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).
161 So. 918 (J. P. Heidt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.