J. P. Heidt v. State
161 So. 918, 26 Ala. App. 648
This text of 161 So. 918 (J. P. Heidt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
J. P. Heidt v. State, 161 So. 918, 26 Ala. App. 648 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
The evidence in this case has been read and considered by the court en banc. It is the opinion of the court that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction; therefore error prevailed by the court’s refusal to give the affirmative charge requested in writing by defendant.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 So. 918, 26 Ala. App. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-p-heidt-v-state-alactapp-1935.