J. P. Equipment Rental & Materials L. L. C. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

288 A.D.2d 187, 732 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10460
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 187 (J. P. Equipment Rental & Materials L. L. C. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J. P. Equipment Rental & Materials L. L. C. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance, 288 A.D.2d 187, 732 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover upon two labor and material payment bonds, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered March 2, 2001, which denied its motion to vacate a judgment entered December 21, 2000, upon its failure to appear or answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To succeed on a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon a default, a defendant must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the underlying action (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Belesi v Gifford, 269 AD2d 552). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default lies within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court and, as a general rule, its determination will not be disturbed (see, Parker v City of New York, 272 AD2d 310).

Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment entered upon its failure to appear and answer, since it failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default. In light of this determination, we need not consider whether the defendant established the existence of a meritorious defense (see, Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v Matteo, 271 AD2d 422). O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pina v. Jobar U.S.A. LLC
104 A.D.3d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Delgado v. Velecela
56 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Miller v. Ateres Shlomo, LLC
49 A.D.3d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hirsch v. Monroe Bus Corp.
13 A.D.3d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Carnazza v. Shoprite of Staten Island
12 A.D.3d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Westchester Medical Center v. Clarendon Insurance
304 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
D'Aniello v. T.E.H. Slopes, Inc.
301 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Chiulli v. Coyne
292 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
De La Barrera v. Handler
290 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 187, 732 N.Y.S.2d 354, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-p-equipment-rental-materials-l-l-c-v-fidelity-guaranty-nyappdiv-2001.