J. Obermann Brewing Co. v. Adams

35 Ill. App. 136, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. Obermann Brewing Co. v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ill. App. 540
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 24, 1889·Published

Opinion

Garnett, J.

The errors assigned on this appeal are all based upon the supposition that a bill of exceptions has been brought to this court. We find, however, that there is no bill of exceptions. There is none in the transcript, which only includes a copy of the praecipe, summons, pleadings, appearance and withdrawal of appearance, verdict, orders of court and appeal bond.

A separate paper entitled, “ Adams v. The J. Obermann Brewing Company,” was left with the clerk of, but was never filed in this court; and we presume the paper was intended to be the original bill of exceptions in the Superior Court, but are not warranted in treating it as a part of this record. There is nothing to connect it with this record, nor do we find any stipulation that the original bill of exceptions may be so used. The original bill may be incorporated in the transcript of the record by agreement of the parties (Sess. Laws, 1887, 147), but otherwise this court has no authority to examine it. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. Obermann Brewing Co. v. Adams, 35 Ill. App. 136, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 515 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

35 Ill. App. 136 (J. Obermann Brewing Co. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.