J. O. Partain & Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

J. O. Partain & Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

10 S.E.2d 304, 63 Ga. App. 105, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 19

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 17, 1940

Docket28383.

StatusPublished

This text of 10 S.E.2d 304 (J. O. Partain & Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J. O. Partain & Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 10 S.E.2d 304, 63 Ga. App. 105, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinions

Sutton, J.

The Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company sued J. O. Partain & Co. Inc;, on an account for $228.27. *106 The itemized statement attached to the petition showed that one item of $51.78 and one for $57.38 were charged against J. O. Partain & Co. Inc., one for $108.54 was billed against J. O. Partain & Co., and one for $10.69 was charged to J. O. Partain Inc. The defendant filed an answer denying the indebtedness sned for. The record recites that “the plaintiff introduced oral testimony in evidence with reference to the account, and a certain contract for telephone service as sued for, as per itemized statement, with the several accounts therein specified; said contract being signed by J. O. Partain & Company, by J. O. Partain. Plaintiff further introduced testimony that the amount sued for was just, due, true, and correct, and unpaid. Defendant introduced testimony to show that the accounts against J. O. Partain & Company Inc. was not owing by the defendant, for the reason that said account was an account of J. O. Partain individually, doing business under the name of J. O. Partain & Co., and was not the account of the defendant.” Held: The judgment rendered by the judge of the civil court of Fulton County in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for was authorized by the evidence, and the appellate division of that court did not err in affirming the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., concurs. Felton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, J.

The Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company sued J. O. Partain & Co. Inc;, on an account for $228.27. *106 The itemized statement attached to the petition showed that one item of $51.78 and one for $57.38 were charged against J. O. Partain & Co. Inc., one for $108.54 was billed against J. O. Partain & Co., and one for $10.69 was charged to J. O. Partain Inc. The defendant filed an answer denying the indebtedness sned for. The record recites that “the plaintiff introduced oral testimony in evidence with reference to the account, and a certain contract for telephone service as sued for, as per itemized statement, with the several accounts therein specified; said contract being signed by J. O. Partain & Company, by J. O. Partain. Plaintiff further introduced testimony that the amount sued for was just, due, true, and correct, and unpaid. Defendant introduced testimony to show that the accounts against J. O. Partain & Company Inc. was not owing by the defendant, for the reason that said account was an account of J. O. Partain individually, doing business under the name of J. O. Partain & Co., and was not the account of the defendant.” Held: The judgment rendered by the judge of the civil court of Fulton County in favor of the plaintiff for the amount sued for was authorized by the evidence, and the appellate division of that court did not err in affirming the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., concurs. Felton, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.E.2d 304, 63 Ga. App. 105, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-o-partain-co-v-southern-bell-telephone-telegraph-co-gactapp-1940.