J. M. v. State

884 So. 2d 481, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657, 2004 WL 2251871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J. M. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2004·No. No. 4D03-3884·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm J.M.’s conviction for burglary. While J.M. claimed that she entered the dwelling to retrieve her own property, she admitted to her stealthy entry in the middle of the night. Section 810.07, Florida Statutes (2002), establishes that proof of stealthy entry is prima facie evidence of entering with intent to commit an offense. The statutory presumption is sufficient to create a prima facie case and avoid a judgment of acquittal. See Thomas v. State, 655 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (finding defendant’s self-serving statements for reason for breaking into home in early hours of morning did not negate statutory presumption so as to preclude submission of case to jury to evaluate defendant’s explanation along with presumption).

Although appellant also challenges the admission of hearsay evidence, we conclude that the admission of the evidence, even if improper, was harmless.

Affirmed.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. M. v. State, 884 So. 2d 481, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14657, 2004 WL 2251871 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 481 (J. M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
655 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)