J. Langdon & Bro. v. Conklin & Martin
10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439
Opinion
It is not competent for a defendant in attachment to move the court to discharge the attachment on the ground that the property attached does not belong to him. And it is error ior a court or judge at chambers to sustain such motion.
Order discharging attachment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J. Langdon & Bro. v. Conklin & Martin, 10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 (Ohio 1859).
10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 (J. Langdon & Bro. v. Conklin & Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.